1/1/2007
SPP.gov Myths vs. Facts . . . the Really Big LIE!
The SPP.gov website has tried
to counter We the People's opposition to the Security and
Prosperity Partnership (SPP) by publishing a rebuttal titled:
Myths vs. Facts
. Note that item number one on the SPP.gov list claims these two things:
Myth: The SPP was an
agreement signed by Presidents Bush and his Mexican and Canadian
counterparts in Waco, TX, on March 23, 2005.
Fact: The SPP is a
dialogue to increase security and enhance prosperity among the three
countries. The SPP is NOT an agreement nor is it a treaty. In
fact, no agreement was EVER signed.
Their 'fact' does not hold up under scrutiny. It is basically
a BALD-FACED LIE! It is propaganda in its boldest form. How do I know Because on a Canadian government website there was a
statement made and signed by Prime Minister Martin which declares the
following: "on March 23, President
Bush, President Fox and I SIGNED the Security and Prosperity
Partnership of North America that establishes the way
forward on our continental agenda for security, prosperity and quality of
life."
The above quote can be found on page 2 of 5. It is the last
sentence in the sub-section titled Canada in North America in
a document signed by PM Paul Martin: http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/cip-pic/ips/ips-overview2-en.asp.
2/4/2008
Snopes' Credibility Damaged . . . Says NAU is 'False'
A warning . . . apparently you CANNOT rely on Snopes. They may be part of the media that is working to suppress the truth or spreading disinformation. Below you will find refutations of the Snopes' contention that the NAU is 'false'.
Snopes apparently never fact-checked and simply 'parroted' the propaganda and lies taken from government websites or spewed forth by government staff. The Department of Commerce is in charge of executing the SPP-NAU Presidential orders for the entire Executive Branch in conjunction with the State Department and, of course, the Department of Homeland Security.
10/25/2007
'Peak Oil' ~ The BIG Lie!
For Starters . . . you should read Jerome Corsi's Black Gold Stranglehold: The Myth of Scarcity and the Politics of Oil and you will discover the following:
- Oil is NOT a fossil fuel
- Oil is ABUNDANT beneath the earth's mantle
- Oil is being found in MANY parts of the world that geologist wrote off as not having the 'profile' for oil discovery.
The book is dry, but full of facts based upon more than 50 years of Russian research which has been published in many prestigious academic journals and other research information as is Corsi's 'signature' . . .
From other sources I have learned that Alaska is FLOATING on oil and that our government has capped major oil finds there and refused to allow any further exploration. The Federal Government also required that the accompanying natural gas be returned to the ground rather than sell/or use it . . . and the list goes on (Read Lindsey Williams below).
9/29/2007
Dorgan's Distinction . . . NAFTA: Treaty vs. Law
What follows is about the Senate vote on the Mexican trucks . . . Bush has said he will veto it. Ergo, MANY voted 'yea' last night to CYA and make brownie points. The REAL proof in the pudding will be HOW or IF they vote to overturn the veto. I am predicting that they WON'T overturn the veto. That way they are 'ollie, ollie home free' and smelling like a rose. The trucks will roll and they can prove they voted against them.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1.
From my perspective the MOST SIGNIFICANT statements to come out of the above article were THESE:
"Repeatedly, in arguing from the floor of the Senate for his amendment, Cornyn mischaracterized NAFTA as having created a "treaty obligation" requiring the United States to allow Mexican trucks free access to U.S. roads."(1)
"Dorgan objected, pointing out that NAFTA was passed in 1993 as a law, not a treaty."(1)
Why is that distinction important? For two very good reasons:
9/14/2007
Propaganda Meisters Spin North American Union As 'Community'
How cleverly the promoters of the North American Union have used the word 'community' when discussing the NAU. Beware . . . because it is a very subtle form of PROPAGANDA. To dissect the propaganda, let's compare Pastor's term of North American 'Community' with the TRUTH, which is they are attempting to create a 'union.'
First let's examine the definition of community, as defined by Webster's:
- (a) all the people living in a particular district, etc., and (b) the district, city, etc., where they live.
- a group of people living together as a smaller social unit within a larger one, and having interests, work, etc., in common.
- a group of nations loosely or closely associated BECAUSE OF [or due to] common traditions or for political or economic advantage
- society in general; the public
- ownership or participation in common [community of goods]
- similarity, likeness [community of tastes]
- (a) the condition of living with others (b) friendly association; fellowship
Common Traditions?
Once the three countries have been combined into one, will we have 'common traditions' or will we each 'do' our own in isolation, all with no sense of commonality and unity? Will all workers get off for the combined list of holidays? Not likely, so that means some of each of our 'traditions' will be erased for the common good. Which ones are you willing to forfeit?
9/11/2007
The NAFTA Superhighway ~ Propaganda by an Agent Provocateur
Mr. Hayes . . . I read your derisive article about the 'NAFTA Superhighway'. As an expert, and published author on the coming North American Union I can say that you have mislead your readers as well as any agent provocateur I have ever had to face. As for your comment "The myth of the NAFTA Superhighway persists and grows . . . " is itself debunked by the following two .pdf files found by researcher Debbie Niwa:
 NAFTA Superhighway Committee Notes N=57
NAFTA Superhighway Congratulatory Letters
The NAFTA Superhighway has been morphed into the NASCO, North American SuperCorridor Coalition. However, its original name, 'NAFTA Superhighway' was part of a Congressional Hearing which took place in March of 1995 and is found attached above in .pdf files which are highlighted for easier reading. This is but ONE of the 80 proposed, and in motion, tollways of our CURRENTLY free and already taxpayer purchased existing interstates. Governors who sell those roads to foreign entities are in violation of our Constitution and Exon-Florio laws as I have demonstrated in my article on the subject found here: http://www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com/ViolationsOfLaw.html.
7/01/2007
Attention Canadians . . . Keep Your Eye on the NAU Ball!
This is an email sent to me by a Canadian who read an article of mine in the American Chronicle. Her letter is in navy and my response is below hers in black. I suspect the article she read was my Washington, DC speech which can be found here: http://www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com/SpeakingEvents.html.
This is an example of the 'clueless' in Canada, which is not unlike those who are also 'clueless' in America.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Madam.
I am intrigued by your article, and felt compelled to send a comment of my own.
Your president, and it would seem, not a few of your elected officials plus many others in your country are on a quest to strip myself, my family and friends and my fellow citizens of our freedoms, our country and our way of life.
5/15/2007
The NAU ~ Open Up the Windows and Air Out Your Mind!
The following questions were sent to me via email and may represent the thinking of others. So to help those who still think in the manner to which they have been propagandized and brain-washed, I offer the following responses.
The reader's email questions are in navy and my responses are in green. The text in other colors comes from previously published articles by this author.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Daneen,
I have read much of your publications on the proposed NAU [North American Union] but several questions remain to be answered, or else I have not yet read enough or missed it:
1. What is the present status of this [NAU] project?
3/4/2007
Who Cares About the NAU ~ If You Can't Lick 'em, Join 'em!
Dear Dr. Peterson:
Your article [Treason Abounds ~ Gov't Cabal Plots North American Union] is very compelling, well researched and I believe all it reports.
I have been interested in the concept of the New World Order since I heard the newly elected yet uninaugurated Ronald Reagan, in the Fall of 1980, give his first press conference where he mentioned the "New World Order."
He actually gave televised speeches on his perceived need for a borderless union of the entire Western Hemisphere. He justified the need based on the coming European Economic Community and the massive wealth through stolen technology and cheap labor, which had arisen in the Asian Pacific Rim. No one blinked, except maybe me. But even I understood why he felt it necessary. As a nation, we were losing our wealth and nuclear position rapidly. The rest of the world, particularly China and India, were closing fast on us and without consolidating, America would be overwhelmed. In other words, outrage at our loss of sovereignty was a luxury America just could not sustain. Isolationism in the nuclear bomb age and growing cheap labor markets just would not work for us. Essentially what he was saying is that the world was about to bury us unless we formed the Western Hemisphere union and worked with the other two spheres of influence toward a New World Order.
12/1/2006
New World Order (NWO) vs. ONE World Order (OWO) vs. One World
I have a question . . . I would
like to know why the anti-globalists keep calling globalism the NEW
World Order (NWO)? I believe that singular word . . . 'NEW' is
perpetuating globalist propaganda in much the same manner as calling
illegal aliens 'undocumented immigrants!' Globalism is NOT NEW, their
goals have been in the works here in America for more than a 100 years.
9/9/2006
America is a Constitutional Republic . . . NOT a Democracy
How often have you heard people refer to America as a Democracy? When was the last time that you heard America referred to as a Republic? There is a very good reason that our Pledge of Allegiance refers to our country as a Republic and there is a very good reason that our Declaration of Independence and our constitution do not even mentioned the word "democracy".
Many people are under the false impression our form of government is a democracy, or representative democracy. This is of course completely untrue. The Founders were extremely knowledgeable about the issue of democracy and feared a democracy as much as a monarchy. They understood that the only entity that can take away the people's freedom is their own government, either by being too weak to protect them from external threats or by becoming too powerful and taking over every aspect of life.
3/30/2006
Attention ~ We are NOT a 'Nation of Immigrants'
How often have we heard the pro-illegal-alien crowd as well as other 'clueless' Americans repeat the mantra "after all we are a nation of immigrants, aren't we?" The answer to that question is a loud and incontrovertible, NO! Most Americans today are NATIVE BORN and therefore NOT IMMIGRANTS! What is left unsaid in the above phrase is the significant fact that our American ancestors came to this country as LEGAL immigrants, which is the antithesis of the current invasion of ILLEGAL ALIENS supported by the open borders, pro-illegal alien crowd! The mantra "a nation of immigrants" is an inaccurate 'branding' of our current American culture and society. It is an incantation that contains substantial disinformation, some subtle, some blatant, which never seems to receive any scrutiny or debate. The following explains why . . .
9/16/2005
Why I am NOT a Hyphenated-American
This column is a response to an article written by Ricardo Chavira titled: More Americans should try 'living on the hyphen.'(1) Mr. Chavira, who endorses and encourages Americans to hyphenate their national identity because it "neatly encapsulates the joys and challenges of being something other than a plain American." Suffice it to say that the expectation of 'joy' emanates from Mr. Chavira because he is a proud "Mexican-American."
Other Authors Fighting Propaganda
3/24/2007
Remember: Freedom is NEVER Free!
Have you ever wondered what happened to the 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence?
Five signers were captured by the British as traitors, and tortured before they died.
Twelve had their homes ransacked and burned. Two lost their sons serving in the Revolutionary Army; another had two sons captured.
Nine of the 56 fought and died from wounds or hardships of the Revolutionary War.
They signed and they pledged their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor.
What kind of men were they?
3/7/2007
Trading Camelot for Globalism
Current policy makes no sense at all. Is the government of the United States still "Of, By, and For the people"? Or, is it responsive to another ideology, Globalism, a new name for an old idea to dominate the world depriving the many to benefit a powerful few?
In all its wars, Americans have sacrificed, fought and many have died for the concept of freedom, the right of individuals to live free from oppression, to better themselves and to have a voice in and influence their government. That concept raised the standard of living of all Americans for nearly two hundred years. During that time this country was the hallmark of freedom in the world, a place where the rule of law and economic opportunity prevailed; a point of refuge, where the world’s oppressed, masses could, once again, breathe free.
2/18/2007
An Emphatic Voice From Canada
Daneen. Your web site was a great find for this Canadian. I am as concerned about my government's unilateral (unconstitutional) pursuit of this NAU as well. Politically I am a "conservatarian" a hybrid of Libertarian and conservative...but primarily I am a supporter of the Canadian constitution and its proper literal reading and application...we in the north have been under attack by statist socialists and "activists" on the high court bench who feel it is their job to "interpret" it or to "re-interpret" it or even "read in" to it things that are clearly not there.
These "interpretive" statist activists in our jurocracy are in the NWO vanguard in this country...clearing the way for one world governance by destroying traditional constitutional sovereignty of the Provinces and the individual. NOW degenerative judicial activism is so rampant in my nation that we had the distinction of supplying the first round of hand-picked one-world-government kangaroos to the globalist’s newly-minted international criminal court. NWO activism on our supreme court is the greatest danger Canadians face in keeping our individual and national freedoms and saving the nation from creeping global-statism....meanwhile, the One-World government socialist/Liberal termites in Parliament use the devolved provincial sovereignty from the Jurocracy's rulings to legislate agendas that come from foreign unelected global governing bodies (UN) into provincial constitutional jurisdiction.
|
